Europe / facility / reviewed 2026-09-28
NorthC Groningen campus
Groningen campus with documented fire-system subcontracting.
NorthC lists Groningen 1 and 2. FireX’s third-hall case identifies the campus but not the numbered building; that uncertainty is preserved.
Follow a relationship.
Direction records the stated relationship. A path through this web does not establish intent, causation or control beyond its individual records.
Listed campus operator
NorthC → NorthC Groningen campus
NorthC publishes a combined Groningen 1 and 2 location listing.
Date not isolated · facility operator
Main contractor and installer
Hamer → NorthC Groningen campus
Hamer installed the water-mist system in the third-hall project described by FireX.
Date not isolated · fire protection contractor
Design and supply
FireX → NorthC Groningen campus
FireX designed and supplied the water-mist system to Hamer.
Date not isolated · equipment design supply
Commissioning
FireX → NorthC Groningen campus
FireX commissioned the system after Hamer’s installation. A maintenance appointment is not established.
Date not isolated · commissioning contractor
Located in
NorthC Groningen campus → Netherlands
Geographic context; this edge does not imply government ownership or funding.
Date not isolated · location
Proposed data-center levy scope
NorthC Groningen campus → AI companies & data-center operators
This named data-center facility falls within the sector addressed by the independent regeneration proposal. The liable legal entity, assessment basis and collection jurisdiction remain policy questions; this is not an enacted obligation or a payment.
Date not isolated · proposed levy coverage
What remains unresolved.
Facility identity needs careful matching
LD10’s client is confidential. The NorthC case does not identify its numbered Groningen building. Historical Colt names are not automatically mapped to a later operator.
Next research step: Use planning references or dated operator records to resolve identity without guessing from similar names.
Different stages, different responsibilities
A named builder, installer or equipment supplier is not automatically a maintenance provider. FRA7 remains a construction-stage record; announcements do not establish completed commissioning.
Next research step: Add completion certificates and separately sourced operating appointments as they become public.
Sources in this record.
- LD10 Data CentreMercury · Publication date not isolated · source access 2026-09-28
Historical project period May 2017–October 2019. Client explicitly confidential; the facility code is not used to infer an operator.
- Green Mountain creates data-center harmony with natureSchneider Electric · 2015-10-01 · source access 2026-09-28
Historical supplier account identifies Rennesøy, cooling design and installed infrastructure. Marketing claims of zero emissions are not adopted; no maintenance contract is established.
- SPIE builds AI-enabled data centre for firstcolo in Rosbach vor der HöheSPIE · 2026-06-30 · source access 2026-09-28
Construction announcement: ground-breaking June 2026; phased completion forecast by end-2028. Named scopes are assignments, not proof of completed work.
- Groningen 1 & 2 data centerNorthC · Publication date not isolated · source access 2026-09-28
Operator lists its Groningen campus. Contractor case does not identify which numbered building contains the third-hall project.
- NorthC Datacenter, GroningenFireX · Publication date not isolated · source access 2026-09-28
Explicit scope split: FireX designed, supplied and commissioned; Hamer installed. Generic maintenance offerings on the page are not a site maintenance appointment.
- Efficiënt onderhoud en beheer van datacenters bij Colt Technology ServicesSPIE Netherlands · Publication date not isolated · source access 2026-09-28
Undated contractor-hosted case, credited to Datacenterworks. Names Amsterdam and Roosendaal, M&E maintenance and 24/7 hands-and-eyes services; current site ownership and contract continuity remain unverified.