← Locate in the interconnected atlas

Europe / facility / reviewed 2026-09-28

Colt Roosendaal · historical case

Roosendaal site named in a maintenance case.

The site identity is retained as published; current ownership and the contract’s end date need further records.

Follow a relationship.

Direction records the stated relationship. A path through this web does not establish intent, causation or control beyond its individual records.

documented

Historical named client

Colt Technology Services / Colt DCS → Colt Roosendaal · historical case

Client identity in an undated case; present ownership not inferred.

Date not isolated · historical operator

documented

Mechanical/electrical maintenance

SPIE → Colt Roosendaal · historical case

SPIE’s case names this location within the Colt maintenance appointment.

Date not isolated · maintenance contractor

documented

24/7 hands-and-eyes services

SPIE → Colt Roosendaal · historical case

Historical on-site technical support; current contract continuation is unverified.

Date not isolated · technical operations

documented

Located in

Colt Roosendaal · historical case → Netherlands

Geographic context; this edge does not imply government ownership or funding.

Date not isolated · location

proposal

Proposed data-center levy scope

Colt Roosendaal · historical case → AI companies & data-center operators

This named data-center facility falls within the sector addressed by the independent regeneration proposal. The liable legal entity, assessment basis and collection jurisdiction remain policy questions; this is not an enacted obligation or a payment.

Date not isolated · proposed levy coverage

What remains unresolved.

Operating appointments have time limits

The Hamar award is dated; the Colt cases are undated. Neither supplies contract expiry, renewal or a complete current subcontractor register.

Next research step: Add dated owner confirmations, procurement notices and renewal records before labelling these relationships current.

Facility identity needs careful matching

LD10’s client is confidential. The NorthC case does not identify its numbered Groningen building. Historical Colt names are not automatically mapped to a later operator.

Next research step: Use planning references or dated operator records to resolve identity without guessing from similar names.

Sources in this record.

  1. LD10 Data CentreMercury · Publication date not isolated · source access 2026-09-28

    Historical project period May 2017–October 2019. Client explicitly confidential; the facility code is not used to infer an operator.

  2. Datasentersatsning på HamarCBRE Norway · 2024-02-27 · source access 2026-09-28

    Norwegian primary announcement: CBRE Global Workplace Solutions / Data Centre Solutions awarded technical operations. Contract expiry and renewals are not disclosed.

  3. NorthC Datacenter, GroningenFireX · Publication date not isolated · source access 2026-09-28

    Explicit scope split: FireX designed, supplied and commissioned; Hamer installed. Generic maintenance offerings on the page are not a site maintenance appointment.

  4. Efficiënt onderhoud en beheer van datacenters bij Colt Technology ServicesSPIE Netherlands · Publication date not isolated · source access 2026-09-28

    Undated contractor-hosted case, credited to Datacenterworks. Names Amsterdam and Roosendaal, M&E maintenance and 24/7 hands-and-eyes services; current site ownership and contract continuity remain unverified.